Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Care Compare / Nursing Homes / California / Pasadena
Fonteum Care Compare · California · Pasadena

Nursing homes in Pasadena, California: 13 Medicare-certified facilities.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, and ownership type for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Pasadena — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset (4pq5-n9py).

Average CMS overall rating in Pasadena: 2.3 / 5

View at Medicare.gov →All California cities →
Snapshot May 6, 2026·13 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Pasadena, California·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info (4pq5-n9py)·State overview →·Module overview →·Methodology →
How Pasadena compares

Pasadena vs the California state average

Overall ★ — this city
2.3
State avg 3.2 / 5
-0.9 vs state
Staffing ★ — this city
2.5
State avg 3.1 / 5
-0.6 vs state
Facilities — this city
13
1,162 statewide

State averages are CMS-published per-state means from the same snapshot; the city figure is the mean across the 13 rated facilities above.

Where Pasadena sits

All 13 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Pasadena sit in Los Angeles County, California. County is the geographic unit CMS uses for staffing-desert and access analysis.

All Medicare-certified nursing homes in Pasadena, California

Villa Gardens Health Care Unit
842 East Villa Street · CCN 555429 · Non profit - Corporation
54 certified beds · 41.6 avg daily residents · 5.27 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 5 / 5 · Last standard survey December 5, 2025
4
Overall
4
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
The Californian Pasadena Healthcare
120 Bellefontaine Street · CCN 055480 · For profit - Limited Liability company
82 certified beds · 56.2 avg daily residents · 5.10 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 4 / 5 · Last standard survey February 20, 2026
3
Overall
2
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness Center
2585 E. Washington Blvd. · CCN 055548 · For profit - Limited Liability company
99 certified beds · QM 5 / 5 · Last standard survey May 2, 2024
3
Overall
1
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
The Bellefontaine Healthcare Center
150 Bellefontaine St · CCN 056080 · For profit - Limited Liability company
130 certified beds · 121.2 avg daily residents · 3.79 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 5 / 5 · Last standard survey May 5, 2025
3
Overall
3
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Saint Vincent Healthcare
1810 N. Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 555119 · For profit - Limited Liability company
78 certified beds · 70.7 avg daily residents · 3.92 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 1 / 5 · Last standard survey November 21, 2025
3
Overall
3
Staffing
4 / 5
Health Insp.
Foothill Heights Care Center
1515 North Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 555894 · For profit - Limited Liability company
49 certified beds · 42.1 avg daily residents · 4.13 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 4 / 5 · Last standard survey April 17, 2025
3
Overall
2
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Pasadena Grove Health Center
1470 N Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 055617 · For profit - Limited Liability company
71 certified beds · 65.4 avg daily residents · 4.10 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 3 / 5 · Last standard survey February 28, 2025
2
Overall
3
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Cedar Pine Post Acute
1640 N. Fair Oaks Avenue · CCN 555213 · For profit - Corporation
99 certified beds · 57.5 avg daily residents · 4.22 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 5 / 5 · Last standard survey May 23, 2025
2
Overall
4
Staffing
1 / 5
Health Insp.
Brighton Care Center
1836 N. Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 555338 · For profit - Limited Liability company
99 certified beds · 85.9 avg daily residents · 4.22 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 2 / 5 · Last standard survey January 29, 2026
2
Overall
2
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Pasadena Nursing Center
1570 North Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 555893 · For profit - Limited Liability company
52 certified beds · 51 avg daily residents · 4.24 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 4 / 5 · Last standard survey March 20, 2025
2
Overall
2
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Pasadena Palace Tcu
716 South Fair Oaks Ave · CCN 055341 · For profit - Limited Liability company
75 certified beds · 64.3 avg daily residents · 4.38 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 2 / 5 · Last standard survey November 19, 2025
1
Overall
3
Staffing
1 / 5
Health Insp.
Golden Rose Care Center
1899 N Raymond Ave · CCN 055862 · For profit - Corporation · SFF Candidate
99 certified beds · 85.3 avg daily residents · 4.58 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 3 / 5 · Last standard survey June 5, 2025
1
Overall
2
Staffing
1 / 5
Health Insp.
Camellia Gardens Care Center
1920 N. Fair Oaks Avenue · CCN 056316 · For profit - Limited Liability company
80 certified beds · 73 avg daily residents · QM 3 / 5 · Last standard survey March 7, 2025
1
Overall
1
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Reading the data

What these CMS ratings mean

Every star column on this page comes straight from CMS’s Five-Star Quality Rating System. Fonteum re-publishes the federal numbers without re-scoring them — the definitions below are CMS’s, not ours.

Overall star rating
A 1-to-5 summary CMS derives from the health-inspection, staffing, and quality-measure ratings. It is a relative ranking, not an absolute score — roughly the top fifth of facilities earn 5 stars and the bottom fifth earn 1.
Health inspection rating
Based on the three most recent state standard surveys plus any complaint investigations, weighted toward recency. More and more severe deficiencies lower the rating.
Staffing rating
Built from payroll-based (PBJ) nurse staffing hours per resident day, case-mix adjusted, including registered-nurse hours and weekend coverage.
Quality-measure (QM) rating
Drawn from a set of MDS- and claims-based clinical measures (e.g. pressure ulcers, falls, hospitalisation, antipsychotic use) across short- and long-stay residents.
Special Focus Facility (SFF)
A separate CMS program flagging facilities with a persistent pattern of serious health-inspection problems. “SFF” marks an active designation; “SFF Candidate” marks a facility on the candidate list.

Full methodology: how Fonteum sources and signs CMS nursing-home data.

Other California cities with nursing homes

Compare Pasadena with nearby markets — facility counts from the same CMS snapshot.

Los Angeles78Long Beach25Sacramento22San Diego21Fresno19San Jose19Oakland18Riverside18San Francisco18Hayward16Anaheim14Stockton14

Fonteum research on nursing-home quality

Star ratings vs actual resident harm
Where CMS overall stars diverge from documented harm-level deficiencies.
Nursing-home staffing deserts by county
Counties where reported nurse hours per resident day fall furthest behind.
Nursing-home ownership networks
How chain ownership concentrates across Medicare-certified facilities.
Facilities banned from new Medicare admissions
Payment-denial enforcement actions and the facilities they hit.

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
66reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures